January 10, 2024
By Antoinette Monardo The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Williams v. Tuck, 2023 ONCA 452 grapples with a particular issue concerning abuse of process, namely vexatious litigants, and sheds light on the process required to obtain a vexatious litigant order. Context The appellant, David Williams, commenced three actions in succession against the same defendants, […]
December 20, 2023
By Riley Groskopf The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its decision in BelairDirect Insurance Company v. Continental Casualty Company, 2023 ONCA 834. The decision addresses priority of coverage for motor vehicle accidents outside of the statutory accident benefits context, and issues of mistake. Context A vehicle leasing corporation called WTH leased a motor vehicle […]
December 14, 2023
By Erin Crochetière The Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of a trial decision holding the defendant driver liable for a collision with a cyclist and granting over 2.5 million in damages, in Sanson v. Paterson, 2023 ONCA 798. The plaintiff, Ms. Geraldine Sanson, respondent on appeal, was a cyclist riding home in the […]
November 29, 2023
By Katrina Taibi On November 24, 2023, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Wasylyk v. Simcoe (County).[1] On January 12, 2011, Melinda Wasylyk was driving eastbound on Country Road 88, when she collided with a westbound vehicle operated by Darlene Wos, resulting in catastrophic injuries. Ms. Wasylyk had previously lost control of […]
November 22, 2023
By Michael Kryworuk On November 3, 2023, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Trillium Mutual Insurance Company v. Emond, 2023 ONCA 729, allowing an appeal from a lower court declaration that an insurer was required to fully cover the replacement costs of its insureds’ flooded property, inclusive of any additional costs to […]
November 16, 2023
By Jennifer Singh In Jack-O’s Sorts Bar v. US Liability Insurance Co., 2023 ONSC 5925, United States Liability Insurance Company (“the insurer”) brought a summary judgment motion to determine whether it had a duty to defend Jack-O’s Sorts Bar and the bar’s owner, Harold Douglas Eakins (“the insureds”), in a personal injury claim. The court […]
