Skip to main content

RP Blog

Can an Exclusion Clause Always Remove an Insurer’s Duty to Defend?

In a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Thunder Bay (City) v. Great American Insurance Company, 2024 ONCA 837, the Court of Appeal considered the circumstances in which an exclusion clause may not remove an insurer’s duty to defend. Background Various legal proceedings were pursued against the CityRead More

Claims Struck against Employer for Negligent Investigation and Vicarious Liability for Intrusion Upon Seclusion

By Michael Kryworuk On November 11, 2024, Justice Jane Dietrich of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto released her decision in M.P. v. Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2024 ONSC 6295. This decision concerned a motion brought by the defendant, Ontario Power Generation Inc. (“OPG”), to strike a numberRead More

Application of Ontario’s Loss Transfer Provisions to Alberta Insurer

By Kathryn Orydzuk The case of Aviva Insurance Company v. Echelon Insurance, 2024 ONSC 5921, arises out of a motor vehicle accident that involved a motorcycle insured by Echelon under a policy issued in Ontario and a Chevy Silverado insured by Aviva under a policy issued in Alberta. The accidentRead More

Destructive Testing Protocols Should be Specific and Address Prejudice to Other Parties

By Megan Chan In the recent Ontario Superior Court decision Logan v. Stryker Canada Corp., 2024 ONSC 6171, the court addressed a motion for an order under Rule 32 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Facts A medical device, manufactured by one of the defendants, Stryker Canada Corp., was usedRead More

Rogers Partners LLP Welcomes Four New Associates

We are pleased to announce that Susan McKelvey, Shane Marston, Mihail Salariu, and Jeffrey Allen have joined Rogers Partners LLP as associates. We are excited to have them on board and look forward to the impact they will make as part of our growing team!Read More

The Court of Appeal Weighs in on Prejudgment Interest Rate Applicable to Non-Pecuniary General Damages

By Erin Crochetière The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently weighed in on the issue of the prejudgment interest rate applicable to claims for non-pecuniary general damages claims in Henry v. Zaitlen, 2024 ONCA 614.[1] The underlying action arose from a medical malpractice claim. At trial, the plaintiff was awardedRead More

The 2026 SABS Amendments Require Changes to Ontario’s Priority Dispute Scheme

By Jason Frost Ontario Regulation 383/24 (https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r24383) has amended the SABS for policies issued after June 30, 2026, making many of the previously standard SABS benefits only available for most persons injured in accidents in Ontario if they purchased optional benefits . With the new SABS effective July 1, 2026,Read More

Courts Protect the Rights of Litigants despite their Counsel’s Conduct

By Jordan Petruska In Baldasio v. City of Toronto, 2024 ONSC 5391, the defendant, City of Toronto brought a motion for dismissing the action for delay. Background This action arose from a slip and fall incident on January 13, 2014. On December 29, 2015, the plaintiff commenced an action againstRead More

SABS Amendments Likely to Increase Auto Insurance Premiums and Many Ontarians will not Have Access to Significant Benefits, Without any “Choice”

By Jason Frost With Ontario Regulation 383/24 (https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/r24383), the Ontario Government has amended the SABS for policies issued after June 30, 2026, to remove many of the previously standard SABS benefits for most persons injured in an accident on Ontario. The impact of these changes may be catastrophic. The AmendedRead More

Landlord Not Responsible for Slippery Sidewalk

By Farid Mahdi In the recent decision of Burley v. City of Ottawa et. al. (“Burley”),[1] the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reaffirmed that the defendant building owners did not owe their plaintiff tenant a common law duty to maintain the municipal sidewalk adjacent to their property, that they wereRead More

Court Dismisses Action on the Basis of use of an “Untravelled” Highway

By Emily Vereshchak In Bello v. City of Hamilton, 2024 ONSC 5457, the Court examined whether the plaintiff’s personal injury action ought to be dismissed on the basis that the plaintiff was cycling on an untraveled potion of highway in the City of Hamilton. Facts The plaintiff was biking withRead More

Rogers Partners 30th Anniversary Client Party

Last night, we had the pleasure of celebrating Rogers Partners’ 30th anniversary at a wonderful client appreciation party. A big thank you to our clients and colleagues who have been part of our journey over the past three decades. We look forward to many more successful years ahead!Read More

CERB and CRB: Are they Deductible from an Income Loss Award?

By: Katrina Taibi Overview: In Ferreira v. Hopper,[1] the Ontario Superior Court considered for the first time whether the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) can be deducted from an income loss award in the context of a motor vehicle accident. Background Facts: The plaintiffRead More

Expert Knows Best – The Role of Expert Evidence in Medical Malpractice

By Elizabeth Branopolski In the recent decision of Abdul-Hussein v. Zabel, 2024 ONSC 4035, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice reiterated the important role expert evidence plays in medical malpractice claims. Background The self-represented plaintiff, Ms. Abdul-Hussein, consulted with the defendant, ophthalmologist Dr. Werner Zabel, for a cataract surgery consultation.Read More

Rule 2.1.01:A “Blunt Instrument” Played Sparingly

By Eli Feldman Introduction On September 9, 2024, for reasons set out in Auguste v. Ottawa Police Services et al., 2024 ONSC 4956, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the claims of Cheryl Auguste and her three children (collectively, the “plaintiffs”) pursuant to r. 2.1.01 of the Rules ofRead More

Sealing the Deal: The Hurdles Faced by Litigants in Obtaining Sealing Orders and Possible Alternatives

By Cameron Allan It is not unusual for individuals embroiled in legal proceedings to express concerns about the personal and private information divulged in evidence and put into public record during the litigation process. Privacy and security are important to many of us, after all.  As a result, litigants mayRead More

Improperly Naming a Party Without Legal Capacity – Not a Simple Misnomer

By Antoinette Monardo In Little v. Bramcan Investments Limited, 2024 ONSC 1485, the plaintiff was an undischarged bankrupt at the time the action was commenced. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice determined that the action not being brought in the name of the trustee in bankruptcy was not a simpleRead More

Multiple Rogers Partners LLP Lawyers Recognized as Best Lawyers Award Recipients

Rogers Partners LLP is pleased to announce that the following lawyers have been included in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™: Stephen Ross, Kevin Adams, Anita Varjacic, Brian Sunohara, David Rogers, and Jason Frost.Read More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Miranda Lacalamita discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in McKee v. Shahid, 2024 ONSC 4258, granting the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s pleadings in its entirety, but allowing the plaintiff to amend the claim to plead one cause of action.Read More

When Are the Reasons Provided by a Judge Insufficient?

By Sebastian di Domenico In Willick v. Willard, 2023 ONCA 792, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of the plaintiffs who argued, among other things, that the trial judge erred in law by failing to provide sufficient reasons. This was a complex medical malpractice case. On March 10,Read More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Sarah Sevier discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Morrissey v. Wawanesa Insurance Company, 2024 ONCA 602, allowing a plaintiff’s appeal, finding that both the Licence Appeal Tribunal and Division Court erred in their interpretation and application of O. Reg. 403/96, StatutoryRead More

The New Rule for Bifurcation

By Megan Chan The new Rule 6.1.01(1) of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure came into effect on July 1, 2024. This new Rule was considered in LaPointe v. Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board, 2024 ONSC 4040. The action involved personal injuries suffered by Hudson LaPointe while playing inRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Jaaron Pullenayegem discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Hasan v. Trillium Health Centre (Mississauga), 2024 ONCA 586, dismissing a doctor’s appeal in a medical malpractice case, and upholding the trial judge’s conclusions. Overview The plaintiff, Mr. Hasan, suffered a stroke andRead More

Internet Attacker Misses Appeal Deadline

By Shannon Mascarenhas The case of Clancy v. Farid, 2024 ONCA 568, certainly has a colourful history. For an in depth summary of the case in the lower court, see our firm’s blog post from earlier this year. In short, this was a claim for defamation brought by 53 plaintiffsRead More

Welcome To Our New Articling Students!

We’re excited to announce that our new articling students have started at Rogers Partners LLP! Miranda Lacalamita, Jaaron Pullenayegem, Heera Sen, and Sarah Sevier recently completed law school and are one step closer to becoming lawyers. We’re thrilled to have them on board!Read More

Leave to Amend Pleadings is Not an Absolute Right

By Sebastian di Domenico In McFadden v. Psutka, 2024 ONCA 203 (CanLII), the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed an appeal from the dismissal of the appellants’ motion for leave to amend their claim. This case arises from alleged negligent treatment provided by the respondent, Dr. David J. Psutka. The motionRead More

2024 Summer Social

Our team had a blast at last night’s Blue Jays game for our Summer Social event! It was an evening filled with fun, camaraderie, and great memories!Read More

Amending Pleadings – A Reminder of Relevant Rules and Requirements

By Riley Groskopf The recent decision in Wiseway Global Canada Consulting Ltd. v. Shen, 2024 ONSC 4005, concerned a motion before the Superior Court of Justice seeking to make a series of amendments to a Statement of Claim after the completion of discoveries, pursuant to Rule 26.01 of the RulesRead More

Nunc Pro Tunc Orders – When Can a Court Back-Date the Issuance of a Claim?

By Nasra Esak In a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Norman Towing (7344508 Canada Inc.) v. Riordan Leasing Inc., 2024 ONCA 518, the Court of Appeal outlined the relevant factors courts must consider when granting a nunc pro tunc order. Nunc pro tunc (latin for “now forRead More

Municipality Feels the “Butterfly Effect” on its Highway Maintenance Obligations

By Michael Kryworuk On April 18, 2024, Justice Adrianna Doyle of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Bellville released her decision  in The Corporation of the Municipality of Marmora and Lake v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario, 2024 ONSC 2254. This matter concerned an application broughtRead More

2024 End of Term Dinner

Several lawyers from our firm attended last night’s End of Term Dinner. Thank you to The Advocates’ Society for organizing such a wonderful event. We had a great time catching up with friends and colleagues!Read More

Summary Judgment Motions: Don’t Appeal Before the Motion is Complete

By Katrina Taibi Overview: In Athanassiades v. Rogers Communications Canada Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeal concluded that absent truly exceptional circumstances, a summary judgment motion should not be appealed until it is complete. Background Facts: The plaintiff, Andrew Athanassiades, brought an action against the defendant, Rogers Communication Canada Inc. (“Rogers”),Read More

COVID Business Interruption Coverage Denial Upheld by ONCA

By Kathryn Orydzuk Background The appellants/plaintiffs appealed the June 5, 2023 decision of Penny J. of the Ontario Superior Court (Workman Optometry Professional Corporation v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance, 2023 ONSC 3356), which was heard by the Ontario Court of Appeal on June 12, 2024 (Workman Optometry Professional CorporationRead More

Denial of Fraudulent Insurance Claim Upheld on Appeal

By Jennifer Singh The Appeal in Legault v. TD General Insurance Company, 2024 ONCA 439, arose from a trial decision dismissing an action brought by Shelley Legault against TD Insurance Company (“TD”) relating to TD’s denial of Ms. Legault’s claim under her homeowner’s insurance policy following a fire at herRead More

Congratulations to Megan Chan and Eli Feldman!

Megan Chan and Eli Feldman have successfully completed their articling term with Rogers Partners LLP and will be joining the firm as associates following their call to the Bar in July. Megan and Eli will be excellent lawyers. We wish them continued achievement!Read More

OBA Anatomy of a Trial Conference

The Ontario Bar Association’s Anatomy of a Trial Conference is back by popular demand! It will be held on June 13 and 14, 2024, in person in Toronto and by webcast. Two of our lawyers are part of the stellar faculty. Stephen Ross will be moderating a demonstration of ClosingRead More

Keeping a Party in an Action Can (and Sometimes Should) Lead to Paying Costs

By Jordan Petruska In Zaza v. Toronto, 2024 ONSC 2931, the defendant, Beasley Enterprises Limited was ordered to pay costs to the co-defendant, The City of Toronto for keeping them in the action and failing to conform to the defence and indemnity provisions of their licence agreement. Background                                  This actionRead More

Farid Mahdi Joins Rogers Partners

Rogers Partners LLP is happy to announce that Farid Mahdi has joined the firm as an associate lawyer! Farid previously practiced at plaintiff and defence law firms, and has a thorough understanding of the thought process behind resolving and litigating claims from both the plaintiff and defence perspectives. Welcome Farid!Read More

The Applicability of a Pollution Exclusion in Determining the Duty to Defend

By Emily Vereshchak In Construction Distribution & Supply Company Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company (CNA Insurance), 2024 ONCA 405, the Court of Appeal analyzed the applicability of an exclusion clause in an insurance policy in relation to pollution liability. The appellant, Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), appealed the decision of theRead More

Liability of Landlords for Dog Bites Occurring on Their Premises

By Erin Crochetière The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently considered the liability of landlords for dog bites occurring on premises they own, in the case of Walpole v. Crisol, 2024 ONCA 400. The appellants, the Walpole family, were visiting the home of the defendants, Tammy Brush and Larry Ostertag, whenRead More

Beware of the Surface – Statutory Defences Available for Municipalities

By Elizabeth Branopolski In the recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Hamilton-Dawkins v. Town of Ajax, 2024 ONSC 2152, the Court considered whether the Town of Ajax was able to rely on the statutory defences available under s. 44 of the Municipal Act to avoid liability. Background TheRead More

Rogers Partners Presents at OIAA Kawartha/Durham Spring Education Day

Thank you to the Ontario Insurance Adjusters Association Kawartha/Durham Chapter for inviting us to speak at their Spring Education Day. David Rogers, Jason Frost, Andrew Yolles, Meryl Rodrigues, and Antoinette Monardo presented at the seminar. It was great to see new and familiar faces!Read More

A Helpful Reminder about Pleadings

By Antoinette Monardo In Rivard v. Kingston Police, 2023 ONSC 6627, the Divisional Court simultaneously grappled with a motion to strike out an amended statement of claim, and a cross-motion for leave to amend the amended claim. Context On September 7, 2018, the plaintiff (respondent on appeal) was involved inRead More

Experts and Settlement Proposals Don’t Mix

By Cameron Allan A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice serves as a reminder for counsel to carefully consider the types of documents being provided to their expert witnesses for the preparation of expert reports. In Simmermon v. Djoudad et. al., 2024 ONSC 2388, a motion judgeRead More

Brian Sunohara Speaking at Straight From The Bench Conference

One of our partners, Brian Sunohara, has been invited to speak at the Middlesex Law Association’s Straight from the Bench Conference 2024, which will be held on May 6, 2024 in London. The conference will feature six judges, including a keynote address by the Chief Justice of Ontario, The HonourableRead More

Bullying is Never Okay

By Celina Stoan Overview The case of Clancy v. Farid (liability decision reported at 2022 ONSC 947, and damages decision reported at 2023 ONSC 2750) involved 53 individually named plaintiffs and one defendant, Tanvir Farid. The plaintiffs resided in Canada, the United States and Ireland, and all but one wereRead More

Sebastian di Domenico Joins Rogers Partners

We’re pleased to announce that Sebastian di Domenico has joined Rogers Partners as an associate lawyer! Sebastian previously gained experience representing insurers in occupiers’ liability and automobile accident (tort and accident benefits) claims, and he also acted for plaintiffs in medical malpractice and a variety of personal injury cases. WelcomeRead More

2024 Practice Management Seminar & Dinner

Our lawyers and students gathered last week for our Practice Management Seminar. We hold this event each year as part of our ongoing training program. We discussed strategies for handling files at the initial stage, privilege disputes at discoveries, time management, delegating to support staff, and achieving milestones as lawyersRead More

Compelling Discovery and Striking Pleadings

By Riley Groskopf A recent motion was brought at the Superior Court of Justice regarding the producibility of individuals under disability for discovery, and the refusal of a party to do so. The motion decision in  Antczak v. Avakian, 2024 ONSC 1715 serves as a good reminder of the fundamentalRead More

Late Notice and Lack of Duty of Care: Dismissal of Municipality Trip and Fall Claim

By Nasra Esak In Marderosian v. City of Niagara Falls, 2024 ONSC 1043, the Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls brought a summary judgement motion to determine whether the plaintiff’s claim was barred for lack of timely notice, as well as whether it had a duty of care toRead More

Head of Canada’s Insurance and Banking Regulator Floats Backstop Fund to Mitigate Effects of Future Catastrophic Weather Events

By Michael Kryworuk In February 2024, Peter Routledge, head of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), spoke at the 2024 CatIQ Canadian Catastrophe Conference. For those perhaps unfamiliar with the organization, OFSI is Canada’s sole financial regulator over the banking system and the premier regulator of insuranceRead More

Cameron Allan Joins Rogers Partners

We’re very happy to welcome Cameron Allan to Rogers Partners LLP as an associate lawyer! Cameron practiced at a civil litigation firm in Thunder Bay before recently moving back to Southern Ontario. He handles a wide variety of personal injury and property damage claims.Read More

Stephen Ross and Jack Fitch Recognized as Leading Lawyers in Lexpert

Stephen Ross and Jack Fitch have been recognized by their peers for inclusion in the 2024 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory. The identification of leading practitioners for the Lexpert Directory is based on a comprehensive annual survey. The lawyers named in the Lexpert Directory are acknowledged as leaders in their respective fields,Read More

Discharging a Jury: How Much Explanation is Required from a Trial Judge?

By Katrina Taibi Overview: In Penate v. Martoglio[1] the Court of Appeal concluded that when a trial judge discharges a jury, they must explain their reasons for doing so beyond conclusory remarks. Background Facts: The plaintiff, Norman Penate, was born on July 15, 1996 at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto. Read More

Driver’s Deception Ends in Denied Coverage

By Kathryn Orydzuk The decision in Wong v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONSC 1111, addresses an unusual scenario involving a denial of insurance coverage after the insureds lied about who was driving the defendant vehicle. Wong was the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident in 2019 withRead More

LAT TALES (Div. Ct. Edition): “Minor Injury” vs. “Subject to MIG Limits” and entitlement to s. 25 In-Home Assessments (and potentially, Attendant Care Benefits)

By Jennifer Singh This matter of Co-Operators Insurance Company v. Bennett[1] concerns an appeal by Co-operators General Insurance Company (“Co-Operators”) from a LAT decision which determined that the respondent, Helen Bennett, was eligible for funding for an attendant care benefit assessment, given that she had been removed from the MinorRead More

2024 Associates Appreciation Dinner

We had a wonderful time last night at the home of our senior partner, Stephen Ross, for our Associates Appreciation Dinner!Read More

Reasonable Evidence Must be Met Before a Jury Quantifies Special Damages

By Jordan Petruska Barry v. Anantharajah, 2024 ONSC 740, arose out of a motor vehicle accident where the plaintiff was hit by a motor vehicle while crossing a crosswalk. The plaintiff made a claim for special damages including loss of income, loss of competitive advantage and loss of earning capacity.Read More

Electronic Messages Between Spouses Have an “Extremely High” Expectation of Privacy

By Emily Vereshchak In Howell, McDonnell v. Freire, Aviva Insurance, Echelon Insurance, 2024 ONSC 586, the Court considered whether the time, expense, prejudice and volume of documents contained in months of private electronic messages between alleged spouses ought to be produced to determine if the plaintiff’s action was properly commencedRead More

An Expanded Approach to Vicarious Liability under the Highway Traffic Act

By Erin Crochetière The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently expanded the applicability of the vicarious liability provision outlined in s. 192(2) of the Highway Traffic Act in Desrochers v. McGinnis, 2024 ONCA 63. The case involved an accident whereby the plaintiff, Megan, was operating an ATV on a dirtRead More

To See or Not To See: Claiming For Damages After Witnessing Fatal Car Accident

By Elizabeth Branopolski In Bustin v. Quaranto, 2023 ONSC 5732, Vince Quaranto (“the defendant”) brought a motion to strike a claim brought by a bystander alleging personal injuries arising from witnessing a motor vehicle accident. The court determined the plaintiff alleged sufficient material facts in his claim to establish aRead More

Expert Opinions: Beware a Biased Expert

By Celina Stoan In Denman v. Radovanovic, 2022 ONSC 4401, following a July 18, 2022, mid-trial voir dire, Justice Ferguson ordered the defence’s expert Dr. Redekop excluded from testifying on the grounds of bias. The 35th paragraph of Her Honour’s decision reads “This is the first time I have doneRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Itai Gibli discussed the recent decision in Horvat v. Alam, 2024 ONSC 51. This decision concerned a disqualification motion, and the Superior Court analyzed whether a lawyer has a conflict of interest by acting as counsel of record in a litigation to which they (1) areRead More

Obtaining a Vexatious Litigant Order – The Process Matters

By Antoinette Monardo The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Williams v. Tuck, 2023 ONCA 452  grapples with a particular issue concerning abuse of process, namely vexatious litigants, and sheds light on the process required to obtain a vexatious litigant order. Context The appellant, David Williams, commenced three actions inRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Samuel Pevalin discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Boal v. International Capital Management Inc., 2023 ONCA 840, in which the Court considered the criteria to establish an ad hoc fiduciary duty and whether a claim against the appellant’s financial advisor disclosed aRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Eli Feldman discussed the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal (the “ONCA”) in Baker v. Blue Cross Life Insurance Company of Canada, 2023 ONCA 842, concerning the entitlement of a group disability insurance policy member to long-term disability benefits after suffering a sudden strokeRead More

Holiday Sweater Day

Our firm was looking festive today for Holiday Sweater Day! We wish everyone a safe and happy holiday season!Read More

“Mistaken Priority”: SABS Jurisprudence Inapplicable to Tort Liability Coverage Priority

By Riley Groskopf The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its decision in BelairDirect Insurance Company v. Continental Casualty Company, 2023 ONCA 834. The decision addresses priority of coverage for motor vehicle accidents outside of the statutory accident benefits context, and issues of mistake. Context A vehicle leasing corporation calledRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Megan Chan discussed the recent decision Ovari v. Brant Community Healthcare System[1], in which the Court considered a motion to strike pleadings for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action pursuant to Rule 21.01(1)(b). Notably, although the plaintiff was self-represented, the Court granted the defendants’Read More

The Importance of Raising Argument at the Court of First Instance to Preserve a Right of Appeal

By Erin Crochetière The Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of a trial decision holding the defendant driver liable for a collision with a cyclist and granting over 2.5 million in damages, in Sanson v. Paterson, 2023 ONCA 798. The plaintiff, Ms. Geraldine Sanson, respondent on appeal, was aRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Itai Gibli discussed the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in SIR Corp v Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2023 ONCA 778. Facts During the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadian provincial governments and American state governments enacted emergency orders which prevented in-person dining at restaurants (“the Orders”).[1]Read More

When the Private Insurance Exception Does Not Apply

By Kathryn Orydzuk The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently interpreted and applied the provisions of the Insurance Act intended to address double recovery and the private insurance exception in McCurdy, et al. v Maille, et. al., 2023 ONSC 6857. In the reasons on this post-trial motion regarding collateral benefits,Read More

2023 Holiday Party

A good time was had by all at our employee holiday party last Friday! It was great to get together in a festive atmosphere!Read More

Absences in Reasoning: Are They Legal Errors?

By Katrina Taibi On November 24, 2023, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Wasylyk v. Simcoe (County).[1] On January 12, 2011, Melinda Wasylyk was driving eastbound on Country Road 88, when she collided with a westbound vehicle operated by Darlene Wos, resulting in catastrophic injuries. Ms. WasylykRead More

Fridays with Rogers Partners

At our weekly meeting, Megan Chan discussed the recent decision Wu v. Di Iorio, 2023 ONSC 6417, in which the Court refused the applicant’s motion for disclosure of a copy of an online server. Background The background of this case involves a lengthy divorce dispute between the applicant, Nancy Wu,Read More